Over the last two decades, numerous ACIP members declared financial ties to vaccine manufacturers, but continued to participate in discussions and cast votes on matters directly tied to those companies.
Multiple members cast votes despite receiving or recently receiving funds from pharmaceutical companies affected by the votes.
Why should you care about the curious case of Dr. Peter Marks, MD, PhD? The recently resigned head of the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)? Because Dr. Peter Marks provides an excellent case study of what happens when the government settles for acceptable instead of excellent in scientific administrator (bureaucrat) positions.
DURING the summer of 2021, the UK Medical Freedom Alliance (UKMFA) became concerned about an unseasonal and unprecedented rise in excess mortality in Scotland, seen in the official ONS data. The onset of this rise varied across different age cohorts, coinciding with a timepoint of around 12 weeks following the Covid vaccine rollout to each cohort. It was, notably, unrelated to deaths from COVID-19.
Would 92% of American adults have gotten a Covid shot had they known the “vaccines” only offered a 0.85% reduction in risk? Would young men have taken the jab if they had known it did not prevent transmission?
IN THE new era of biosecurity totalitarianism when authorities actively seek to silence even the most qualified dissenting voices, perhaps nothing could be more corrosive to public confidence than finding that a leading research institute participated in a deliberate fraud.
Another Devil’s advocate © 2021. All rights reserved.
