THIS is the second part of an edited version of the representation to Baroness Heather Hallett by barrister Anna Morris KC last Wednesday on behalf of those injured by Covid vaccinations.
The vaccine injured and bereaved have spent the past three years, both individually and as a collective, asking for help from this country’s medical professionals, mainstream media and members of parliament. They have been met with standard responses that promote the vaccine and that completely fail to address the needs of the injured and bereaved.
IN March of this year a paper on excess mortality was published in Medicine and Clinical Science, titled ‘Annual All-Cause Mortality Rate in Germany and Japan (2005 to 2022) With Focus on The Covid-19 Pandemic: Hypotheses and Trend Analyses’, authored by Hagen Scherb and Keiji Hayashi, from the Institute for Computational Biology in Munich and the Hayashi Pediatric Clinic in Osaka. It provided significant hard data on the very high mortality rates in these two countries associated with the two Covid-19 vaccination roll outs.
Two years later Dr Raine, in a speech boasting of her mRNA enabling role, revealed the critical influence in this of Sir Andrew Pollard, Chief Investigator on the University of Oxford Covid-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx-1 n-CoV-19) trials and heavily involved in the development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at Oxford, and how she and the head of the vaccine task force, Kate Bingham, decided to ‘tear up the rule book’.
On July 5, this study was published on the Lancet Medical Journal’s pre-print server—the server where researchers can place their studies in order for them to get peer-reviewed. And according to Dr. Peter McCullough, who was the lead researcher, despite the fact that this study was experiencing “hundreds of reviews per minute,” the Lancet Medical Journal decided to pull it down.
Another Devil’s advocate © 2021. All rights reserved.
