I discovered that the US Covid pandemic response was not a public health response run by the HHS, CDC or any other public health body. Instead, it was a biodefense/counter-terrorism response, run by the Pentagon, National Security Council, and Department of Homeland Security.
Why should you care about the curious case of Dr. Peter Marks, MD, PhD? The recently resigned head of the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)? Because Dr. Peter Marks provides an excellent case study of what happens when the government settles for acceptable instead of excellent in scientific administrator (bureaucrat) positions.
In a report handed down on Tuesday, Australia’s federal Covid Inquiry found that extreme public health restrictions, coupled with a lack of transparency about the evidence informing these decisions, has led to a major slide in public trust.
US Congressional hearings probing the origins of Covid-19 continued this week, with Tony Fauci, former Director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), in the hot seat.
In January we published the first ten parts of Paul Weston’s series of articles intended for those who have not yet heard the truth about the disaster caused by the response to the covid non-pandemic. We are now publishing the final ten parts.
Purveyors of panic over long covid, such as our favourite source of information Global Health Now, have simply refused to report an important study showing that it was most likely not distinct from other post-viral syndromes, with the logical conclusion that what people are reporting as long covid may not even be caused by Covid-19.
Verduyn’s analysis suggests that Johns Hopkins University succeeded in creating a Covid-19 dashboard for the purposes of communicating the impression of a pandemic or exaggerating what would, given the mortality burden, otherwise have been perceived as a routine influenza season.
Over 50 prominent UK academics have signed an open letter to Baroness Heather Hallett, chair of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, calling for urgent action to address the shortcomings of the probe so far.
So what is the evidence that the state’s psychological experts are denying responsibility for the deployment of behavioural science strategies, and what could be motivating these claims?
In an essay for the Epoch Times, Tucker notes that draconian lockdowns were imposed on virtually all people of the world after the World Health Organization showered praise on Chinese officials for ordering lockdowns to “interrupt virus spread.”
Another Devil’s advocate © 2021. All rights reserved.
