A key source for the anti-Donald Trump dossier needs to explain why he needs to use classified information in his upcoming trial, a judge ruled on Aug. 30.
Clinton’s campaign and other Democrats funded the anti-Trump dossier, which contained a number of unsubstantiated claims that remain unsubstantiated to this day.
Longtime Clinton operative Charles Dolan admitted to the FBI that he provided (and fabricated) some of the information that Danchenko passed on to Steele.
Even as FBI cyber experts deemed the allegations false within a day—the CIA would later do the same—the bureau’s counterintelligence arm continued to probe the claims, a move backed by senior bureau officials such as Comey.
FBI leaders pulled field agents from other investigations in 2016 to pursue a false tip linking presidential candidate Donald Trump to a Russian bank, but they concealed that the probe was spurred by information provided by rival Hillary Clinton’s campaign, an FBI agent testified in court Monday.
“Bet most people still don’t know that a Clinton campaign lawyer, using campaign funds, created an elaborate hoax about Trump and Russia. Makes you wonder what else is fake,” he said.
Former FBI General Counsel James Baker testified Thursday that the bureau investigated the data alleging a Trump connection to the Kremlin-linked bank, and found that “there was nothing there.”
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, the Obama appointee overseeing the case, agreed to strike certain portions of testimony delivered Wednesday by Marc Elias but rejected the request for a mistrial.
Clinton is asking U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks, the Bill Clinton appointee overseeing the case, to toss all claims against her with prejudice, or leaving no ability for Trump to refile the suit.
The attorney who represented Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign when he provided a tip to the FBI regarding Clinton’s rival, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, is headed to trial after an attempt to get his case dismissed was rejected by a federal judge.
Attorneys for former Democratic National Committee attorney Michael Sussmann filed a motion seeking to exclude certain expert testimony from his case, accusing special counsel John Durham’s attorneys of missing a key deadline and asking a judge to block testimony in his false statement case.
Another Devil’s advocate © 2021. All rights reserved.